BLOG

Design’s blank cheque


Are we on our high horse if we suggest design can change the world? Are we at a point where people can actually start believing in it? There was an incredible article written by Cameron Koczon on a List Apart a few weeks ago, and he brings up some brilliant points. It’s time for design to be held in higher regard. This isn’t a “hey look at us!” kind of ploy. This is a legitimate business strategy.

Design shouldn’t be an afterthought. Not these days. It’s not a matter of “we’ve got this thing, let’s make it pretty so it’ll ship.” It’s a matter of making the thing pretty – as in functional AND aesthetically pleasing so it WILL ship. The article goes on to talk about where design should stand in the business space. A must-read for all of us. My favourite quote? “It is difficult for design to flourish in organizations that don’t understand it.”

It happens. Even in agencies in our own backyard. Designers are employed to polish where we should be in there from the start, coming up with ideas, iterating, polishing, and then repeating the process. We should all feel proud of what we’re putting out there, not remorseful about pieces we don’t want touching our portfolio in case it spreads some vile disease.

It’s a matter of education. Educating clients on the value of good design. Educating everyone in our organization about the same. And continuously educating ourselves on what’s happening in our industry to help push our city and ourselves further.

Still here? Go read the article. 

by Steve in Feature, Minor Rant | Comment
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=674160044 Erik Hagborg

    I think there is an important concept here that often gets lost when people talk about design and creativity. Design ISN’T just about making things look good. “Design” is about planning something so that it works well. That includes more than just “prettying it up”.
    I am not a Graphic Artist. But I am a designer. I do not define the colour palette, visual style, tone, imagery or iconography of sites that I work on. But I am a UX Designer. I plan the structure, layout, content, architecture and interface elements (among other things).

    I will also be one of the first to say that the appearance and graphic design of (anything) is extremely important, but only if the end product also works well. Apple products aren’t popular because they look good. They are popular because the work really well and that is because of how they were designed.
    So in response to this article (and post) I would say that designers (and the design community) need to recognize and embrace the reality that Graphic Art is but one part of the design process. And it is an important part, but please don’t think that design is limited to graphic art or that you need to be a graphic artist to be a designer.  Design is much bigger.

  • Brett Tackaberry

    I certainly agree with the article and Erik’s points but i want to extend Eriks comment further that design starts at vision and concept. Most professionals understand the distinction between the concept of design and graphic design. But I think the solution goes beyond education of those who don’t. Designers think if they’re a part of a project from the beginning that it’ll magically be successful. That in itself is naive. The important point is that project/product vision must balance business and audience objectives. The problem in some agencies is there is natural competition or gap between these two when they need to be in sync. More specifically everyone needs to be designer. The ALA article highlights this as an attribute of the Apple team.

    But the other point i want to make is I don’t think it means that one role should be responsible. Just by bringing design in early in the process doesn’t guarantee success. The designer needs to recognize the steps required to deliver a product with equal consideration given to business/strategy/design/development.

    All in all, I think we all agree that ideal design needs all team members to be design thinkers.

  • Archives